Introduction
La ligne des MacBook Pro s'est affinée. Ou non ? Le modèles de 13 pouces est disponible en deux versions plutôt difficiles à différencier, car le seul indice est le nombre des ports. Les ingénieurs de chez Apple ont-ils simplement repris le modèle d'entrée de gamme et réussi à caser la Touch Bar quelque part ou s'agit-il d'un nouveau modèle muni d'une version simplifiée de la (coûteuse) Touch Bar existante ? Ou bien de quelque chose de complètement nouveau ? Secouons un peu le prunier pour voir ce qu'il en tombe !
Vous voulez plus de vues éclatées ? Suivez-nous sur Facebook, Instagram et Twitter pour n'en perdre aucune. Si vous voulez recevoir les nouvelles dans votre boîte courriel, abonnez-vous à notre newsletter.
Ce dont vous avez besoin
Vidéo d'introduction
-
-
Avant de foncer, jetons un œil au menu de ce nouveau modèle :
-
Écran “Retina” IPS à rétro-éclairage LED de 13,3 pouces avec une résolution de 2560 sur 1600 (227 ppp), gamme de couleurs P3
-
Processeur quad-core de 1,4 GHz Intel Core i5 (capable de performer à 3,9 Ghz en mode Turbo Boost) avec carte graphique intégrée Iris Plus Graphics 645
-
Mémoire intégrée LPDDR3 2133 MHz de 8 Go
-
SSD PCIe de 128 Go, 256 Go, 512 Go, 1 To ou 2 To
-
Deux ports Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) compatibles avec recharge, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt et USB 3.1 2ème Gén
-
Coprocesseur sur mesure Apple T2
-
-
-
Nous sommes ravis de revoir la prise jack, bien qu'elle soit un peu seule. (Deux ports plus une prise jack, c'est un peu maigre pour un machine de "pro", non ?)
-
La procédure d'ouverture s'effectue les yeux fermés maintenant. Nous faisons un sort à quelques vis Pentalobe et clips avant de risquer un œil dans un MacBook Pro qui… ressemble étonnamment à l'ancien modèle avec touches de fonction.
-
Les 58,2 Wh de capacité de la nouvelle batterie dépassent légèrement les 54,5 Wh de la batterie de l'ancien modèle. Voilà peut-être pourquoi l'ordinateur gère en plus la fonction Touch Bar, le capteur Touch ID et la puce T2 tout en gardant l'autonomie de 10 heures.
-
Elle fait même pâlir les 58,0 Wh de la batterie du modèle 13" plus cher, qui alimente plus de cœurs et de TDP (Thermal Design Power ou enveloppe thermique).
¿ Hay algún problema si se reemplaza la batería original de 58.wh con una de 54.5wh ? ¿ o no hay problema ?
-
-
-
On dirait qu'Apple a limé le caloduc à gauche du système d'évacuation, pour faire de la place au capteur Touch ID, le long de la Touch Bar. Comparez la version 2019 "Function keys" (en haut de l'image) au modèle de cette année (en bas).
-
Y a-t-il de quoi se faire du souci ? Les ordinateurs "Pro" ultra-fin avaient déjà plumé le système de refroidissement. Les contraintes de l'enveloppe thermique (TDP) à 15 W du processeur de cette année n'ont pas baissé depuis 2016.
-
Nous faisons tournoyer la vis à tête plate du connecteur de la batterie et éteignons le courant – merci à notre kit Manta Bit Set pour le coup de main !
-
Nous décollons un autocollant là où logeait le SSD modulaire du modèle 2016 pour trouver un blindage soudé. Ce n'est pas vraiment surprenant, mais ça déçoit quand même. C'en est fini d'un des derniers composants remplaçables de la ligne des MacBook Pro.
Any soldering can be desoldered…but that’s easier said than done.
-
-
-
-
Le ventilateur du côté opposé au haut-parleur semble avoir maigri depuis son apparition de 2016.
-
Nous savions que les ingénieurs audio de chez Apple étaient des magiciens, mais nous sommes sceptiques de la capacité des magiciens à produire un son de la même qualité avec un haut-parleur de taille tellement réduite.
-
Seules quelques vis Torx fixent ces haut-parleurs. Pas de colle comme sur tellement d'autres modèles. Le remplacement est on ne peut plus simple.
-
Le circuit imprimé Thunderbolt modulaire est fait pour être mis à jour. La dernière fois, il était soudé à la carte mère. Cette nouvelle configuration ressemble plus au reste de la gamme moderne des Pro.
-
Nous nous retrouvons tout de suite nez à nez avec un autre chef d'œuvre modulaire : le module de la prise jack. Celui-ci inclut la prise jack, le microphone ainsi que le connecteur Touch ID et se remplace facilement sans avoir à déranger la coûteuse carte mère.
The predecessor was the mid-2017 Function Keys MacBook Pro 13”, not the late-2016 model.
Apparently that headphone jack module has a Hall-effect sensor that is extremely fragile and will be ruined if you touch it. Oh, and the whole assembly is so fragile you’re suppose to replace it every time it gets removed.
a este modelo se le puede cambiar el ssd? o esta fijo y soldado?
Fixed and soldered.
Fijo y soldado.
-
-
-
Soulevons un peu cette carte mère pour voir ce qu'elle cache :
-
Processeur Core i5-8257U SREZ2 Intel
-
Coprocesseur T2 APL1027 339S00604 Apple
-
2 modules de RAM LPDDR3 de 2 Go K4E6E304EC-EGCG Samsung
-
Stockage flash de 64 Go TSB 42260 F1473 TWNA1 1914 Toshiba
-
Contrôleur Thunderbolt 3 JHL7540 Intel
-
338S00267-A0 (probablement un CI de gestion d'alimentation Apple)
You’re right! We’ve made the change. Thank you!
-
-
-
Voilà que nous dénichons encore plus de trésors :
-
2 modules de RAM LPDDR3 de 2 Go K4E6E304EC-EGCG Samsung
-
Stockage flash de 64 Go TSB 42260 F1473 TWNA1 1914 Toshiba (pour un total de 128 Go)
-
Module sécurité NFC 80V18 NXP
-
CD3217B12 et TPS51980B Texas Instruments (probablement des contrôleurs d'alimentation)
-
Codec audio CS42L83A Cirrus Logic
-
95828A HRTZ X915HKB et 9240H1 8905FD Intersil
-
1SA 339S00616 SS9521026 (probablement un IC de gestion d'alimentation Apple)
What is the silkscreen marking on the 2 devices (speaker drivers) at the top right corner of the PCB?
-
-
-
Nous trouvons le même système clavier butterfly 3.5 que celui découvert lors de la mise à jour MacBook Pro datant de ce mois de mai.
-
Apple s'attend vraiment à ce que les claviers continuent à devoir être réparés ou s'agit-il juste d'assurer aux clients traumatisés qu'ils peuvent acheter ?
-
D'après certaines rumeurs, Apple serait sur le point d'abandonner le système "papillon" pour retourner au système "ciseaux" plus fiable. Il s'agit peut-être ici d'un système hybride.
-
-
-
Nous ne voulions qu'effleurer la nouveauté, nous en avons donc déjà fini ! Ce MacBook sans touches de fonction avait bien quelques petits secrets à révéler. Récapitulons :
-
La Touch Bar-ification embarque un SSD soudé (nul), des ports modulaires (génial), un haut-parleur et un dissipateur thermique rétrécis (euh…) et une puce T2 (joker) dans son sillage.
-
Le matériel du clavier a eu sa mise à jour, mais est toujours sur la liste du programme de réparation. Le clavier papillon semble être aussi éphémère que l'insecte dont il porte le nom.
-
- Le trackpad (pavé tactile) se retire sans déranger la batterie.
- Les vis Pentalobe propriétaires continuent à embêter les réparateurs.
- Le module batterie est toujours solidement collé au boîtier, ce qui complique le retrait de ce composant consommable.
- La RAM soudée limite l'évolutivité et la longévité.
- Le SSD n'est plus remplaçable, mais vu que son prédécesseur était un disque propriétaire, le nouveau système de stockage soudé fera peu près le même effet au réparateur moyen.
Dernières pensées
Indice de réparabilité
(10 étant le plus facile à réparer)
Merci à ces traducteurs :
75%
Ces traducteurs nous aident réparer le monde ! Vous voulez contribuer ?
Commencez à traduire ›
39 commentaires
I love how professional these breakdowns have become over the years!
SSD chips do go bad over time; most vendors recommend total replacement after 240 gigabytes of overwrites per gigabyte of chip. Soldering down the SSD flash chips means these machines need Ball Grid Array rework when reconditioned for resale after lease return. Apple will be doing that rework, so we can maybe assume the ticklish microsurgery doesn't phase them?
Why solder them down in the first place? Because of the T2 chip. T2 is very…possessive of SSD memory.
But apple is not gonna do the repair beyond the warranty, so I don't believe it's a consolation that apple would do that repair when I buy computers to last me a decade. You seem even a bit optimistic about this.
QuincyMB -
I’m very curious about SSD failures over time. Are there are any stats out there? I’m talking about the high quality NAND used in the likes of Apple SSDs and not USB/SD-card failures.
biscuit -
Ya no. Nearly every consumer grade SSD comes with a 5 year warranty (or ~150 TBW per 250 GB). An SSD will last for decades without issue or loss of space. Modern SSDs eclipse traditional HDDs and even those these days can last a good chunk of time (my NAS is purring and it’s HDDs are about 6 years old).
When you say “most vendors” I’m sure you meant to say no one. People have long been crunching theoretical usage patterns in most general consumer usage against SSDs and have figured they’ll last something like 15 years, give or take. Obviously it depends on your usage pattern, but if you wrote 20 GB per day, every day for the life of drive, you’ll hit the manufacturers estimates in ~ 20 years (150 TBW per 250 GB). And that’s the bottom end. So at the bare minimum, with even aggressive usage (45GB a day), you’re likely going to see 10 years, easy. That’s if the drive dies right at 150 TBW/250GB, which is pretty %#*@ unlikely.
Tiem -
@Tiem, you must work for APple as you’re trying to stand proud on false data. That’s Apple marketing style 100%. So..let’s clear the air before your willful misuse of data spreads as ignorance. • 60 to 150 TBW , which takes your 20 yr span and cut is down to about 7. • ..So a SPAN of 7-20 years. • ..I won’t go on about the rest of your abuse of information relay with puffed chest ego writing. • ..SSDs can fail -> making a $40-$100 fix into a $1000 apple repair. (sarcasm with a smile in good fun: … Or am I wrong and it’s a possible death trip to !&&* where Apple swoops in and saves you for $1000 ?) USE FULL & REAL DATA! — Enjoy your week everyone!
Ram, processor bump isn’t that significant. More ram will help it feel snappier after you have more background tasks going.
Both, you can’t decide later on. But if you really are pushed for one, do the RAM, or better still the SSD size.
Totally RAM for sure.
pop -
RAM obviously. Processor is limited by cooling - upgrade to the other 13’ with double cooling fans if you need more CPU performance.
Good overview. A throwaway device should be at throwaway prices. Apple could give these things away if the customer would sign a long term rental agreement for iCloud Drive, Apple Music, and other Apple rental units. I do like the repairability and upgradeability of my 2012 MBP though.
How about a complete keyboard replacement due to a liquid damage?
How easy it is to replace it.
People say that the Mac Book Pro is quiet and not hot.
I don’t wonder why. I wonder why do they buy it.
Doing stuff that need less than 7W TDP call for a 7W TDP Atom (or, slightly better, Celeron or i3 or i5). You don’t need this in a expensive, irreparable platform.) Yes it look cool. I would say Microsoft Surface is better (CHEAPER?! seriously, apple.)
Solder-on HARDDRIVE? What the what.
Let’s face it. When your computer broke down (not the connector, not the keyboard, since most often it’s the motherboard), and you are stuck with two soldered on-board chips guarded by T2, I don’t know what you would like to do.
When any other computer broke down you can at least have a chance to visit your harddrive’s contents by pulling it out.
Connect the surface mount chip to another surface mount device to inspect it? Sure. But who will do that?
Да и вообще SSD на 128 Гб в 2019 году - это просто бред. Apple, WTF?
My MacBook Pro 2011 has 320 Gb!
Reminds me of the inside of an iphone, or ipad Looks as though Apple has applied the success of that technology to their laptop line. Thus making their laptop just another version of that design. It is inevitable that the iPad and Laptop will eventually morph into one as they are coming so close together in operational capability at this point. This appears to confirm that assumption Basically this 2019 macbook pro is nothing more than an iPad design, with external ports and a keyboard. I’m not at all surprised.
About the comments concerning the SSD lifetime: I had a Mid-2012 Retina Macbook Pro bought 7 years ago, a few days after it came out. It had the first SSD in a MacBook Pro, the first Retina display and I maxed it out to 16GB RAM. I’ll have to admit that I had my doubts about the longevity of the SSD at the time.
Well that MacBook Pro got used heavily at least 10 hours a day for 7 years until finally the logic board died. I took out the SSD and I’m still using it inside an enclosure, attached via USB to my new Mac!
Surely the SSD technology has improved since 2012? But even if the tech hasn’t improved at all, I can tell you from experience that your MacBook SSD will most likely outlast the usable lifetime of the laptop (or other components).
Completely agree - there was a webpage about an SSD test where 250GB drives were continuously written until they failed. TLDR - every 250GB of SSD provide 25 years of heavy office use (based on actual heaviest office use among the place running an experiment). So a 1TB drive is good for a century of realistic heavy workload. Even with QLC that has 1/3 of an endurance these are ridiculously long life times that only concern Cloud servers and the like.
So this is the Touch Bar version? What about the non touch bar version, does it still have a replaceable SSD for this years model?
@gadgetuser The non-Touch Bar version has been reworked into what you see in this teardown—Apple reconfigured it and added a Touch Bar. In other words, all MacBook Pros now come with a Touch Bar. If you want a Touch Bar-less notebook computer new from Apple in 2019, the Retina MacBook Air is your only option.
In my opinion, every claim Apple makes about being environmentally responsible and their products being recyclable is nullified by their continued policy of intentionally engineered obsolescence. Hard soldering in RAM and SSD, and glueing in the battery serves no-one but Apple and since recycling is the least best option compared to repair or re-use, their hypocrisy is staggering. Sure, we like thin products but not that much. Why don’t they try launching a 2mm thicker variant of the MacBook Pro with user replaceable RAM, industry standard SSD and battery, and standard USB ports, then see which one users will end up buying. I for one would certainly prefer to know that my money is buying something that will still be working or repairable in 10 years time rather than the current time-bombs Apple is producing where the SSD and battery WILL fail as the technology is inherently degenerative.
“…as the technology is inherently degenerative.”
“…glueing in the battery serves no-one but Apple…”
“…recycling is the least best option compared to repair or re-use…”
When you make false statements like that, you can create all kinds of incorrect conclusions. Let me correct you.
SSD life and reliability is better than it has ever been. The same can be said of Li battery life.
Permanently attaching the battery lowers the cost (consumer benfit), prevents shifting (consumer benefit), and allows for more space and thus the maximum size battery / capacity (consumer benefit). It motivates the manufacturer to use batteries of the highest quality, since they know that every user who has to have their battery replaced prematurely results in a negative mark on the company, and potential loss of future sales (qualtiy battery = consumer benefit).
Every item you use goes into a landfill. Recycling puts it into a finite ‘recycling’ loop, but every product eventually leaves that loop and goes into the ground. Think about that.
This model just has one fan. The higher-end MacBook Pro models have two.
does this model feature a data recover port like earlier models with soldered-on SSD's?
For all those complaining about upgrades, remember that Macs are targeted towards users who don’t tinker with their systems. They just want something that works out of the box. To that end, the MacBook Pro does that. We use them for our creative department at work; I use them for my IT work. We have a ton of PC laptops too. We service the PC laptops all day. We never touch the Mac laptops, because they just work. We have super old MacBooks that are still serviceable with the OEM components.
Also remember that software is coded for specific hardware. Programmers are not going to create code that’s backward compatible forever, and eventually support gets dropped for older hardware. Typical consumers don’t need a computer that lasts forever. They need, and want, one that works with current applications and fits in with the current trends.
The previous year macbooks had a major issue where the display connector backlight pin (a high voltage pin) was next to a low voltage pin that goes directly to the CPU (potentially, and historically, frying CPU’s). Did they fix that in this model and stick a ground pin between the two?
What about the 4 thunderbolt version? Could you provide a tear down for that version because I know if is very different. There are two fans instead of the one in this one.
I don´t feel good at all about the fact that the SSD are soldered down on my MBP Touch Bar. People say that the SSD will outlast the computer anyway, but i mean surely an SSD can go bad at any point i guess? You have all kinds of health parameters like bad block count, retired block count, uncorrectable error count, etc. etc. I dont want to start to see the numbers on those parameters getting higher and higher on my soldered down SSD.
And on my MBP 2011 where i have installed an SATA SSD, i averaged about 30GB writes per day, only from computer processes, without me writing to the disk.
What are the solutions for a failed SSD which is soldered down, can it even be replaced by anybody else than Apple? Im thinking about the fact that the T1/T2 chip seems to be involved with the SSD?
And how much does Apple charge for the job of replacing an SSD?
But where 128gb ssd ????
